I have stayed quiet lately, because what has been discussed here the past little while I have seen no need to comment on. Now I feel I have to say something. I agree with Gary that no sensible solutions to the perceived situation were put forth by Mr Waugh in his article. He said everyone was blaming everyone else so no progress was made. Is that not blaming on his part. Also, this same Mr Waugh was a councillor here himself back in the nineties. Why didn't he and Vince Artuso solve the problem back then. Who will they blame??? If you believe a solution is necessary to protect the water, isn't a scaled down sewer system the solution. We went for the Cadillac solution(Water & Sewers) with Noble, and the gov't just laughed at the amount being needed from them for this few number of people. Doesn't logic then say pick a scaled down solution (Sewer) at a much lower cost, get funding (we hope), then build onto the solution.The water will be protected and system can grow.