Loading...

Metering Private Water Wells

Posted by CL1368 on April 4, 2007 - 5:43pm

The water that comes out of the ground in many areas of the province is undrinkable in its raw form—and not necessarily for bacteriological reasons. Where we live, it needs to he variously filtered, deionized, softened, UV treated and finally tested in a private lab.

However, if private water systems are now to be metered, perhaps government will also consider making this equipment, its installation and maintenance—to say nothing of drilling itself—tax deductable for ordinary rural citizens. (Don’t hold you breath.)

It is hard to imagine that the TSBP would not be fully supportive of measures to introduce this new form of taxation. Under the circumstances, metering seems like a given.

Private wells will be metered, says Durham Region Health Inspector Gregory Law
Durham, February 2007

Over the last year, the Ontario Landowners have identified many negative aspects of Bill 43, The Clean Water Act. One of the most glaring dangers was the ability for municipalities to charge private homes and businesses for the taking of water from private wells. Though we received hundreds of assurances—from both politicians and bureaucrats alike—that this would never happen, never has arrived.

At a recent meeting held by the Municipality of Clarington, the local Health Unit, Conservation Authority, Green Communities-Canada and Eades Well Drilling, Durham Region Health Inspector Gregory Law responded to a question “will governments be charging well owners for drawing water from their wells?” Mr. Law’s answer was “that it was coming for sure. It’s just a question of when.”
The Landowners have learned that the most likely implementation schedule for water meters will be announced in the months following October’s election (depending on the outcome). However, should Mr. McGuinty have his way, the regulations for Bill 43 will be enacted in the spring of 2007. At first, it is likely that all new wells will be required to have a meter in order for a permit to be issued. Furthermore, the regulations will demand all private wells will require an annual or bi-annual inspection along with septic systems. It is expected that all older wells will have to be brought “up to new standards” during this inspection process with the addition of a metering device.
It is also very probably that many municipalities will levy a flat rate water charge onto the tax bills of their residents, based on the number of occupants, and use should they refuse a metering system.
Mr. Law further stated that ground water is part of the public domain and if you’re going to use something that belongs to the public, you’re going to have to pay.

The following are a few examples of the unjust infringements authorized by Bill 43:

(note: bureaucrats comprises the Municipality, the Conservation Authority, or any Ministry of the Government such as Health or Environment)

Section 54 & 79 authorises bureaucrats to enter any private property without consent or warrant, and empowers bureaucrats to make any excavations, collect samples, evidence, or data and compels people to provide any and all information. "a permit inspector may, for the purpose of enforcing this part, enter property, without the consent of the owner or occupier and without warrant",

Section 47 & 53 and Part 4, provides the authority for municipalities to charge for water extraction permits and inspections on private wells and septic systems.

Section 60 dictates that bureaucrats can compel people to pay without appeal, and grants authority to place all costs to your tax bill

Section 88 & 89 saves the bureaucrats and government from any legal action initiated by an individual or business to stop any injustice.

Section 59 & 71 Bankruptcy offers no escape from compliance orders or convictions.

Bill 43, the Clean Water Act (now S.O. 2006 c.22) received Royal Assent on October 19. However the Act will not come into force until a date to be named by Mr. McGuinty’s Cabinet.

So soon not only must I pay $4,500 per year to get my private well water tested by an "accredited lab" because we serve the public and they just "might" drink the water, on top of the water treatment system I put in ($5,000) and maintain with UV light, salt and hydrogen peroxide ($500 per year), but the TSBP will charge me for my water consumption based on a meter that I have to pay for?



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Yet more Commons usurped

This is incredible. All other madness aside, the line that stings in my human heart the most is this tidbit passed off as self-evident matter of fact:

"Mr. Law further stated that ground water is part of the public domain and if you’re going to use something that belongs to the public, you’re going to have to pay."

because it betrays a total disregard for what The Commons were prior to the sinister usurping of them from we the people way back in the time of Malthus, and if you look into that history, it churns your insides to read how the predictions of the nay-sayers to the false science of Malthus were 100% right on the button on the devestating long term effects of this to everyone except the aristocracy.

'Public Domain', as it was defined until just now, meant that they, you and I already 'owned' it, but see here now the future-world where Nature Itself is to be vended back to us, the creatures of this planet. Next will be a tax on wattage from the Sun.

I am reminded of the late Douglas Adams, that last chapter of his Hitchhiker's Guide where the petty middle-management abandoned 'advance settlers' crew busy themselves stuffing leaves in their clothes because they had decreed them the new 'currency' of their castaways home world.

tax the rain too

This doesn't surprise me, actually I'm surprised we dont have GST on rainfall..after all its a service provided to our plants and trees(tongue in cheek ).Actually they have the right to enter your property, but need a warrant to enter your premises, but we all know thats just a phone call away, so its really semantics at best.
Im not sure if you're aware, Gary, but say..for instance you have oil under them dad blasted dunes with UFO attracting metal parts, and an oil company finds out about it, they put in a claim to the minerals and drilling and mining rights, and out you go till they are done, with no compensation to you except if they damage your deck ;)(private joke..)I am haveing a *Wayne * moment..(just kidding Wayne buddy..) but I recall this happening in B.C. just a few years ago...think it was B.C. ..
Its also like way back in my brown long haired days, when I had a house built in a new survey in Hamilton, and they stopped me from drilling a well, that I was going to use to just water the grass..no sir you must use pipeline supplied expensive chemically treated water to water your grass..and then they hit me with..oh..you have an antennae?? thats not allowed you must take it down and get cable..or use rabbit ears..

************************************************************

"How does one "Seem to think". Either you did or you didn't. "
-ZenGary