<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sbp.teledyn.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>South Bruce Peninsular - Tim Hortons in Wiarton - Comments</title>
 <link>http://sbp.teledyn.com/node/775</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Tim Hortons in Wiarton&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>thanks for clarification</title>
 <link>http://sbp.teledyn.com/node/775#comment-1400</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;hi hockey17,&lt;br /&gt;
thanks for clarifying the properties for me.  maybe when the wiarton tim&#039;s is opened it will relieve some of the summer traffic jams in hepworth.&lt;br /&gt;
kltpzyxm&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 13:47:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mxyzptlk</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1400 at http://sbp.teledyn.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tim Hortons</title>
 <link>http://sbp.teledyn.com/node/775#comment-1399</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;mxyzptlk, you are mixing up 2 different properties . The new Tim Hortons is going in where the elementary school was located( bottom of the hill). Kirkland property is the old High school on the top of the hill west of the lights off Wiarton&#039;s main street.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; I also agree with your comments about Carl and his cronies. My question to Carl is when he was mayor in 2000-2006, why didn&#039;t he and council vote to sign over the property? From 2003-2006 he had total control of council and all votes went his way, either 6-3 or 7-2. Why didn&#039;t he vote then? Why blame the new council?? Was it because he knew he&#039;d be breaking the law?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 07:52:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hockey17</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1399 at http://sbp.teledyn.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tim Hortons in Wiarton</title>
 <link>http://sbp.teledyn.com/node/775</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I thought ex-councillor Kirkland bought the old Wiarton school property to build an senior&#039;s home and daycare centre.  I also thought part of the building was to be saved.  Now I see in the paper that the town gets $450,000 and a Tim&#039;s is going in.  Maybe I&#039;m confused about the properties.  Can someone explain what is going on?&lt;br /&gt;
kltpzyxm&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://sbp.teledyn.com/node/775#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://sbp.teledyn.com/taxonomy/term/9">Community</category>
 <category domain="http://sbp.teledyn.com/taxonomy/term/4">Wiarton</category>
 <category domain="http://sbp.teledyn.com/taxonomy/term/46">Economy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 07:19:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mxyzptlk</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">775 at http://sbp.teledyn.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
